Energy Shift
Visualized: The Evolution of Energy Employment (2022–2030P)
The following content is sponsored by the National Public Utilities Council
The Evolution of Energy Employment (2022–2030P)
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), just over half of the 67 million people employed in the global energy industry in 2022 worked in the clean energy sector: 35 million vs. 32 million in fossil fuels. And with the clean energy transition picking up pace, that gap is set to widen.
In this graphic created in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, we explore how global energy employment could change by 2030 in a current policy scenario, using projections from the IEA.
The Rise in Clean Energy Employment
The IEA’s current policy scenario is a conservative projection for progress in line with the present trajectory of our energy system. It doesn’t assume that nations will reach their announced goals or that net zero will be achieved by 2050.
Even within this conservative scenario, the global energy sector is projected to have a net gain of 5.7 million jobs by 2030. Except for the 300,000 jobs added in the oil and gas supply industry, these jobs are all in clean energy.
In a more ambitious scenario, aligned with achieving net zero by 2050, the net gain in jobs is projected to nearly triple to 17 million.
Changes in global energy employment 2022–2030P, millions of jobs | Current policies scenario | Net-zero emissions 2050 scenario |
---|---|---|
Coal supply | -1.4 | -2.8 |
Internal combustion engine vehicles | -1.1 | -6.2 |
Unabated fossil fuel electricity | -0.2 | -1.2 |
Critical minerals | +0.2 | +0.7 |
Oil and gas supply | +0.3 | -2.5 |
Low-emissions fuels | +0.4 | +3.2 |
End-use efficiency | +1.2 | +3.2 |
Energy grids and storage | +1.4 | +3.8 |
Low-emission electricity | +1.7 | +11 |
Electric vehicles and batteries | +3.2 | +7.7 |
Net job creation | +5.7 | +16.9 |
In both scenarios, the global energy industry is poised to create millions of new jobs in the coming years, with the job gains in the clean energy sector significantly outweighing the job losses in the fossil fuel industry.
A People-Centred Transition
With projected growth of this magnitude, the IEA emphasizes that policymakers and industry must support employee transitions from fossil fuels and address skill gaps in emerging industries through education and training.
According to the World Energy Employment report, continued efforts in these areas are crucial to prevent labor shortages and avoid delays in the clean energy transition.
Learn how the National Public Utilities Council is working toward the future of sustainable electricity.
Energy Shift
Ranked: Energy Transition Scores by Country in 2024
This bar chart shows the countries’ highest and lowest energy transition index scores determined by the World Economic Forum.

Ranked: Energy Transition Scores by Country in 2024
The World Economic Forum (WEF) recently unveiled their 2024 Energy Transition Report, which assesses 120 countries around the world on their decarbonization efforts and ranks them on their Energy Transition Index (ETI).
This visualization, created in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, shows the top 10 and bottom 10 countries based on their ETI scores.
How Does the ETI Work?
The ETI is a weighted average of two sub-indexes, system performance (60%) and transition readiness (40%), that rates countries on 46 indicators, including regulation and political engagement, innovation, and infrastructure.
Since the launch of the ETI in 2015, the global average increased from 53.4 to 56.8. However, momentum has slowed recently, and is down 0.3 points since 2022, due to the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and surging inflation interest rates.
The Rankings
The highest energy transition scores come from advanced economies and the top three are Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. The lowest scores, however, come from sub-Saharan Africa.
Rank | Country | ETI Score |
---|---|---|
1 | 🇸🇪Sweden | 78.4 |
2 | 🇩🇰Denmark | 75.2 |
3 | 🇫🇮Finland | 74.5 |
4 | 🇨🇭Switzerland | 73.4 |
5 | 🇫🇷France | 71.1 |
6 | 🇳🇴Norway | 69.9 |
7 | 🇮🇸Iceland | 68 |
8 | 🇦🇹Austria | 67.9 |
9 | 🇪🇪Estonia | 67.8 |
10 | 🇳🇱Netherlands | 66.7 |
11 | 🇩🇪Germany | 66.5 |
12 | 🇧🇷Brazil | 65.7 |
13 | 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 65.6 |
14 | 🇵🇹Portugal | 65.4 |
15 | 🇱🇻Latvia | 65.2 |
16 | 🇪🇸Spain | 64.3 |
17 | 🇨🇳China | 64.1 |
18 | 🇱🇺Luxembourg | 64.1 |
19 | 🇺🇸United States | 64 |
20 | 🇨🇱Chile | 63.9 |
21 | 🇮🇱Israel | 63.8 |
22 | 🇦🇺Australia | 63.7 |
23 | 🇰🇷South Korea | 63.5 |
24 | 🇱🇹Lithuania | 63.2 |
25 | 🇳🇿New Zealand | 62.8 |
26 | 🇯🇵Japan | 62.4 |
27 | 🇨🇦Canada | 62.4 |
28 | 🇭🇺Hungary | 62.1 |
29 | 🇸🇮Slovenia | 61.9 |
30 | 🇨🇷Costa Rica | 61.3 |
31 | 🇵🇱Poland | 61.3 |
32 | 🇻🇳Vietnam | 61 |
33 | 🇺🇾Uruguay | 60.8 |
34 | 🇧🇪Belgium | 60.8 |
35 | 🇨🇴Colombia | 60.7 |
36 | 🇧🇬Bulgaria | 60.6 |
37 | 🇬🇷Greece | 60.5 |
38 | 🇦🇿Azerbaijan | 60.3 |
39 | 🇭🇷Croatia | 60.1 |
40 | 🇲🇾Malaysia | 60.1 |
41 | 🇮🇹Italy | 59.7 |
42 | 🇵🇾Paraguay | 59.6 |
43 | 🇦🇱Albania | 59.4 |
44 | 🇨🇿Czechia | 59.2 |
45 | 🇮🇪Ireland | 58.7 |
46 | 🇸🇻El Salvador | 58.4 |
47 | 🇵🇪Peru | 58.3 |
48 | 🇷🇴Romania | 58.3 |
49 | 🇸🇰Slovakia | 57.5 |
50 | 🇶🇦Qatar | 57.3 |
51 | 🇵🇦Panama | 57.1 |
52 | 🇦🇪United Arab Emirates | 57 |
53 | 🇲🇺Mauritius | 56.8 |
54 | 🇮🇩Indonesia | 56.7 |
55 | 🇨🇾Cyprus | 56.6 |
56 | 🇬🇪Georgia | 56.3 |
57 | 🇲🇽Mexico | 56.3 |
58 | 🇸🇦Saudi Arabia | 55.9 |
59 | 🇹🇷Türkiye | 55.8 |
60 | 🇹🇭Thailand | 55.8 |
61 | 🇲🇹Malta | 55.6 |
62 | 🇴🇲Oman | 55.5 |
63 | 🇮🇳India | 55.3 |
64 | 🇸🇬Singapore | 55 |
65 | 🇲🇦Morocco | 54.9 |
66 | 🇧🇴Bolivia | 54.8 |
67 | 🇲🇪Montenegro | 54.6 |
68 | 🇳🇦Namibia | 54.5 |
69 | 🇱🇰Sri Lanka | 54.2 |
70 | 🇰🇪Kenya | 53.6 |
71 | 🇹🇯Tajikistan | 53.6 |
72 | 🇱🇦Laos | 53.5 |
73 | 🇯🇴Jordan | 53.5 |
74 | 🇪🇨Ecuador | 53.2 |
75 | 🇪🇬Egypt | 53 |
76 | 🇺🇦Ukraine | 52.9 |
77 | 🇰🇭Cambodia | 52.9 |
78 | 🇷🇸Serbia | 52.9 |
79 | 🇦🇲Armenia | 52.7 |
80 | 🇰🇬Kyrgyzstan | 52.7 |
81 | 🇲🇰North Macedonia | 52.6 |
82 | 🇦🇷Argentina | 52.6 |
83 | 🇬🇦Gabon | 52.5 |
84 | 🇿🇦South Africa | 52.4 |
85 | 🇱🇧Lebanon | 52 |
86 | 🇦🇴Angola | 52 |
87 | 🇪🇹Ethiopia | 51.7 |
88 | 🇧🇦Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.5 |
89 | 🇹🇳Tunisia | 51.3 |
90 | 🇨🇮Côte d'Ivoire | 51.2 |
91 | 🇩🇿Algeria | 50.9 |
92 | 🇬🇭Ghana | 50.9 |
93 | 🇿🇲Zambia | 50.9 |
94 | 🇬🇹Guatemala | 50.8 |
95 | 🇻🇪Venezuela | 50.4 |
96 | 🇧🇳Brunei | 50.3 |
97 | 🇩🇴Dominican Republic | 50.1 |
98 | 🇰🇿Kazakhstan | 50.1 |
99 | 🇹🇹Trinidad and Tobago | 49.7 |
100 | 🇳🇵Nepal | 49.6 |
101 | 🇨🇲Cameroon | 49.2 |
102 | 🇮🇷Iran | 49 |
103 | 🇧🇭Bahrain | 48.8 |
104 | 🇰🇼Kuwait | 48.6 |
105 | 🇵🇭Philippines | 48.4 |
106 | 🇭🇳Honduras | 48.3 |
107 | 🇲🇩Moldova | 48.1 |
108 | 🇳🇬Nigeria | 46.9 |
109 | 🇧🇩Bangladesh | 46.8 |
110 | 🇯🇲Jamaica | 46.6 |
111 | 🇸🇳Senegal | 46.6 |
112 | 🇿🇼Zimbabwe | 46.3 |
113 | 🇵🇰Pakistan | 46.2 |
114 | 🇳🇮Nicaragua | 46 |
115 | 🇧🇼Botswana | 45.6 |
116 | 🇲🇳Mongolia | 45.4 |
117 | 🇲🇿Mozambique | 45.3 |
118 | 🇹🇿Tanzania | 44.3 |
119 | 🇾🇪Yemen | 43.8 |
120 | 🇨🇩DRC | 42 |
However, even though sub-Saharan Africa has the lowest regional average score, individual countries are making significant progress. For example, Zimbabwe’s score has increased 33% since 2015, thanks to the increase in their hydropower capacity.
On the other hand, the ETIs of some advanced economies are declining, such as Norway, whose score decreased by 0.4 points over the past nine years. This decrease is due to rising electricity prices and a decline in renewable capacity buildout.
The Largest Economies and the Future
The world’s largest economy, the United States, has remained at 64.0 over the past year. China, however, has moved ahead to 64.1 from 2023 to 2024, thanks to significant growth in areas like batteries, EVs, and high-voltage transmission. The country also allocates the largest share of its GDP to investments in renewables, at 9%.
All countries must dramatically increase their ETI scores to prevent global warming above 1.5 degrees Celsius. While many countries, such as Norway, are stagnating in their progress, others, such as Zimbabwe, exceed expectations for their wealth, signaling the possibility for all countries to meet their climate targets.
Learn how the National Public Utilities Council is working toward the future of sustainable electricity.
Energy Shift
Mapped: The Age of Energy Projects in Interconnection Queues, by State
This map shows how many energy projects are in interconnection queues by state and how long these projects have been queued up, on average.

U.S. Energy Projects in Interconnection Queues, by State
By the end of 2023, more than 11,000 energy projects were in interconnection queues in the United States, waiting for a green-light from regional grid operators to proceed with construction.
This map, sponsored by the National Public Utilities Council, maps out the average age of active energy projects in interconnection queues by state, using data from Berkeley Lab.
Interconnection Queues, Explained
Interconnection queues are lists of energy projects that have made interconnection requests to their regional grid operators. Once submitted, these requests formally initiate the impact study process that each project goes through before grid connection, forming waiting lists for approval known as interconnection queues.
In recent years, both the number and generation capacity of queued projects have surged in the United States, along with the length of time spent in queue.
According to Berkeley Lab, the amount of generation capacity entering queues each year has risen by more than 550% from 2015 to 2023, with average queue duration rising from 3 years to 5 years the same period.
As a result of the growing backlog, a large proportion of projects ultimately withdraw from queues, leading to only 19% of applications reaching commercial operations.
The Backlog: Number of Projects and Average Wait Times
Of the 11,000 active projects in U.S. queues at the end of 2023, Texas, California, and Virginia had the most in queue; 1,208, 947, and 743, respectively.
When looking at the average ages of these projects, all three states hovered around the national average of 34 months (2.83 years), with Texas sporting 28 months, California 33, and Virginia 34.
Vermont, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Florida, on the other hand, had the highest average queue durations; 54, 49, 47, and 46 months, respectively.
Average Queue Duration by Project Type
At the end of 2023, more than 95% of the generation capacity in active interconnection queues was for emission-free resources. The table below provides a breakdown.
Project Type | Average Queue Duration (As of 12/31/2023) | Number of Projects in Queue |
---|---|---|
Wind | 40 months | 841 |
Solar | 34 months | 4,506 |
Wind+Battery | 34 months | 76 |
Solar+Battery | 27 months | 2,377 |
Battery | 24 months | 2,818 |
Wind projects had the highest wait times at the end of 2023 with an average age of 40 months (3.33 years). Solar projects, on the other hand, made up more than 40% of projects in queue.
Overall, reducing the time that these renewable energy projects spend in queues can accelerate the transition to a low-carbon energy future.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, enhancing data transparency, streamlining approval processes, promoting economic efficiency, and maintaining a reliable grid are some of the ways this growing backlog can be mitigated.
Learn how the National Public Utilities Council is working toward the future of sustainable electricity.
-
Energy Shift2 years ago
Ranked: The Cheapest Sources of Electricity in the U.S.
-
Emissions12 months ago
The Most Polluted Cities in the U.S.
-
Energy Shift2 years ago
Animated: 70 Years of U.S. Electricity Generation by Source
-
Electrification2 years ago
Visualized: How the Power Grid Works
-
Clean Energy2 years ago
Breaking Down the $110 Trillion Cost of the Clean Energy Transition
-
Clean Energy2 years ago
The 30 Largest U.S. Hydropower Plants
-
Emissions1 year ago
Visualized: Global CO2 Emissions Through Time (1950–2022)
-
Climate1 year ago
Mapped: Global Temperature Rise by Country (2022-2100P)