Connect with us

Emissions

The Most Polluted Cities in the U.S.

Published

on

The following content is sponsored by the National Public Utilities Council

Bubble chart showing the 21 most polluted cities in the U.S. based on the American Lung Association's 2024 State of the Air report, with a bar chart showing the economic benefit of reducing PM2.5 concentrations, by sector.

The Most Polluted U.S. Cities in 2024

According to the World Health Organization, air pollution is responsible for 7 million deaths annually, and could cost the global economy between $18–25 trillion by 2060 in annual welfare costs, or roughly 4–6% of world GDP.

And with predictions that 7 in 10 people will make their homes in urban centers by mid-century, cities are fast becoming one of the frontlines in the global effort to clear the air.

In this visualization, we use 2024 data from the State of the Air report from the American Lung Association to show the most polluted cities in the United States.

What is Air Pollution?

Air pollution is a complex mixture of gases, particles, and liquid droplets and can have a variety of sources, including wildfires and cookstoves in rural areas, and road dust and diesel exhaust in cities.

There are a few kinds of air pollution that are especially bad for human health, including ozone and carbon monoxide, but here we’re concerned with fine particulate matter that is smaller than 2.5 microns, or PM2.5 for short.

The reason for the focus is because at that small size, particulate matter can penetrate the bloodstream and cause all manner of havoc, including cardiovascular disease, lung cancer, and chronic pulmonary disease.

The American Lung Association has set an annual average guideline of 9 µg/m³ for PM2.5, however, the World Health Organization has set a much more stringent limit of 5 µg/m³.

The 21 Worst Polluted Cities in the U.S.

Here are the top 21 most polluted cities in the U.S., according to their annual average PM2.5 concentrations:

RankCity, StateAnnual average concentration, 2020-2022 (µg/m3)
1Bakersfield, CA18.8
2Visalia, CA18.4
3Fresno, CA17.5
4Eugene, OR14.7
5Bay Area, CA14.3
6Los Angeles, CA14.0
7Sacramento, CA13.8
8Medford, OR13.5
9Phoenix, AZ12.4
10Fairbanks, AK12.2
11Indianapolis, IN11.9
12Yakima, WA11.8
13Detroit, MI11.7
14Chico, CA11.6
14Spokane, WA11.6
15Houston, TX11.4
16El Centro, CA11.1
17Reno, NV11.0
18Pittsburgh, PA10.9
19Kansas City, KS10.8
19Las Vegas, NV10.8

Note: The American Lung Association uses Core Based Statistical Areas in its city and county rankings, which have been shortened here to the area’s principal city, or metro area in the case of the Bay Area, CA.

Six of the top seven cities are in California, and four in the state’s Central Valley, a 450-mile flat valley that runs parallel to the Pacific coast, and bordered by the Coast and Sierra Nevada mountain ranges. As a result, when pollution from the big population centers on the coast is carried inland by the wind—cities #5 and #6 on the list—it tends to get trapped in the valley.

Bakersfield (#1), Visalia (#2), and Fresno (#3) are located at the drier and hotter southern end of the valley, which is worse for air quality. The top three local sources of PM2.5 emissions in 2023 were farms (20%), forest management / agricultural waste burning (20%), and road dust (14%).

Benefit to Economy

While the health impacts are generally well understood, less well known are the economic impacts.

Low air quality negatively affects worker productivity, increases absenteeism, and adds both direct and indirect health care costs. But the flip side of that equation is that improving air quality has measurable impacts to the wider economy. The EPA published a study that calculated the economic benefits of each metric ton of particulate matter that didn’t end up in the atmosphere, broken down by sector, including utilities.

SectorBenefits per metric ton
Residential Woodstoves$429,220
Refineries$333,938
Industrial Boilers$174,229
Oil and Natural Gas Transmission$125,227
Electricity Generating Units$124,319
Oil and Natural Gas$88,838

At the same time, the EPA recently updated a cost-benefit analysis of the Clean Air Act, the main piece of federal legislation governing air quality, and found that between 1990 and 2020 it cost the economy roughly $65 billion, but also provided $2 trillion in benefits.

Benefit to Business

But that’s at the macroeconomic level, so what about for individual businesses?

For one, employees like to breathe clean air and will choose to work somewhere else, given a choice. A 2022 Deloitte case study revealed that nearly 70% of highly-skilled workers said air quality was a significant factor in choosing which city to live and work in.

At the same time, air quality can impact employer-sponsored health care premiums, by reducing the overall health of the risk pool. And since insurance premiums averaged $7,590 per year in 2022 for a single employee, and rose to $21,931 for a family, that can add up fast.

Consumers are also putting their purchase decisions through a green lens, while ESG, triple-bottom-line, and impact investing are putting the environment front and center for many investors.

And if the carrot isn’t enough for some businesses, there is the stick. The EPA recently gave vehicle engine manufacturer Cummins nearly two billion reasons to help improve air quality, in a settlement the agency is calling “the largest civil penalty in the history of the Clean Air Act and the second largest environmental penalty ever.”

Learn how the National Public Utilities Council is working toward the future of sustainable electricity.

Click for Comments

Decarbonization

Visualized: Emission Reduction Targets by Country in 2024

This infographic shows the greenhouse gas emissions targets of all countries and their target years with data from Net Zero Tracker.

Published

on

The preview image for an infographic showing the greenhouse gas emissions for all countries around the globe and their target years compared to 2021 with data from Net Zero Tracker.

Visualized: Emission Reduction Targets by Country in 2024

Since 2021, another 40 countries have established climate goals for 2030. However, the path to net zero remains uneven.

With average national warming already 1.81°C above pre-industrial levels, the international pressure for countries to cut emissions faster and deeper is mounting. So where do countries stand today on their targets?

We’ve partnered with the National Public Utilities Council to answer just this question, using the latest national emission target data from Net Zero Tracker.

A Spotlight on Major Players

The largest countries and richest economies typically emit the most greenhouse gases and thus have the most crucial targets.

CountryEnd TargetEnd Target YearNew Commitment
BeninNet zero2000Achieved
BhutanCarbon negative2030Achieved
ComorosNet zero2050Achieved
GabonCarbon neutral(ity)2050Achieved
GuyanaNet zero2050Achieved
SurinameNet zero2050Achieved
AlbaniaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
AlgeriaReduction v. business-as-usual (BAU)2030Not legally binding
BarbadosCarbon neutral(ity)2030Not legally binding
BelarusEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
BotswanaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
BruneiEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
CameroonReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
CongoReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
Côte d'IvoireReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
CubaOther2030Not legally binding
Czech RepublicEmissions reduction target2030In law
DominicaCarbon neutral(ity)2030Not legally binding
EgyptOther2030Not legally binding
El SalvadorAbsolute emissions target2030Not legally binding
EswatiniReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
GuatemalaEmissions reduction target2030In law
HondurasReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
IranOther2030In law
IraqOther2030Not legally binding
JamaicaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
JordanReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
KenyaReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
LiechtensteinEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
MacedoniaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
MaldivesNet zero2030In law
MauritaniaCarbon neutral(ity)2030Not legally binding
MexicoReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
MoldovaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
MongoliaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
MontenegroEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
MoroccoReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
North KoreaReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
ParaguayReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
PhilippinesReduction v. BAU2030Not legally binding
PolandEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
QatarEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
San MarinoEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
SerbiaEmissions reduction target2030In law
TajikistanEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
TurkmenistanEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
UzbekistanEmissions intensity target2030Not legally binding
VenezuelaEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
ZimbabweEmissions reduction target2030Not legally binding
BermudaOther2035Not legally binding
FinlandClimate neutral2035In law
Antigua and BarbudaNet zero2040Not legally binding
AustriaClimate neutral2040In law
Cayman IslandsOther2040Not legally binding
IcelandCarbon neutral(ity)2040In law
MyanmarNet zero2040Not legally binding
PalestineOther2040Not legally binding
DenmarkNet zero2045Not legally binding
GermanyClimate neutral2045In law
NepalNet zero2045Not legally binding
SwedenNet zero2045In law
AfghanistanNet zero2050Not legally binding
AndorraCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
AngolaNet zero2050Not legally binding
ArgentinaNet zero2050Not legally binding
ArmeniaClimate neutral2050Not legally binding
AustraliaNet zero2050In law
AzerbaijanEmissions reduction target2050Not legally binding
BangladeshNet zero2050Not legally binding
BelgiumCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
BelizeNet zero2050Not legally binding
Bosnia and HerzegovinaEmissions reduction target2050Not legally binding
BrazilCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
BulgariaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Burkina FasoNet zero2050Not legally binding
BurundiNet zero2050Not legally binding
CambodiaCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
CanadaNet zero2050In law
Cape VerdeNet zero2050Not legally binding
Central African RepublicNet zero2050Not legally binding
ChadNet zero2050Not legally binding
ChileCarbon neutral(ity)2050In law
ColombiaCarbon neutral(ity)2050In law
Cook IslandsCarbon neutral2050Not legally binding
Costa RicaNet zero2050Not legally binding
CroatiaClimate neutral2050In law
CyprusClimate neutral2050In law
Democratic Republic of the CongoNet zero2050Not legally binding
DjiboutiNet zero2050Not legally binding
Dominican RepublicNet zero2050Not legally binding
EcuadorZero carbon2050Not legally binding
Equatorial GuineaEmissions reduction target2050Not legally binding
EritreaNet zero2050Not legally binding
EstoniaZero emissions2050Not legally binding
EthiopiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
European UnionClimate neutral2050In law
FijiNet zero2050In law
FranceNet zero2050In law
GeorgiaClimate neutral2050Not legally binding
GreeceClimate neutral2050In law
GrenadaNet zero2050Not legally binding
GuineaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Guinea-BissauNet zero2050Not legally binding
HaitiNet zero2050Not legally binding
HungaryNet zero2050In law
IrelandClimate neutral2050In law
IsraelNet zero2050Not legally binding
ItalyCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
JapanCarbon neutral(ity)2050In law
KiribatiNet zero2050Not legally binding
KyrgyzstanCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
LaosNet zero2050Not legally binding
LatviaCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
LebanonNet zero2050Not legally binding
LesothoNet zero2050Not legally binding
LiberiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
LithuaniaNet zero2050Not legally binding
LuxembourgNet zero2050In law
MadagascarNet zero2050Not legally binding
MalawiNet zero2050Not legally binding
MalaysiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
MaliNet zero2050Not legally binding
MaltaClimate neutral2050Not legally binding
Marshall IslandsNet zero2050Not legally binding
MauritiusNet zero2050Not legally binding
MicronesiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
MonacoCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
MozambiqueNet zero2050Not legally binding
NamibiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
NauruNet zero2050Not legally binding
NetherlandsEmissions reduction target2050In law
New ZealandNet zero2050In law
NicaraguaNet zero2050Not legally binding
NigerNet zero2050Not legally binding
NiueNet zero2050Not legally binding
NorwayEmissions reduction target2050In law
OmanNet zero2050Not legally binding
PakistanNet zero2050Not legally binding
PalauNet zero2050Not legally binding
PanamaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Papua New GuineaNet zero2050Not legally binding
PeruNet zero2050Not legally binding
PortugalCarbon neutral(ity)2050In law
RomaniaNet zero2050Not legally binding
RwandaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Saint Kitts and NevisNet zero2050Not legally binding
Saint LuciaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Saint Vincent and the GrenadinesNet zero2050Not legally binding
SamoaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Sao Tome and PrincipeNet zero2050Not legally binding
SenegalNet zero2050Not legally binding
SeychellesNet zero2050Not legally binding
Sierra LeoneNet zero2050Not legally binding
SingaporeNet zero2050Not legally binding
SlovakiaNet zero2050In law
SloveniaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Solomon IslandsNet zero2050Not legally binding
SomaliaNet zero2050Not legally binding
South AfricaNet zero2050Not legally binding
South KoreaNet zero2050In law
South SudanNet zero2050Not legally binding
SpainClimate neutral2050In law
Sri LankaCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
SudanNet zero2050Not legally binding
SwitzerlandNet zero2050In law
TanzaniaNet zero2050Not legally binding
The BahamasNet zero2050Not legally binding
The GambiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Timor-LesteNet zero2050Not legally binding
TogoNet zero2050Not legally binding
TongaNet zero2050Not legally binding
Trinidad and TobagoNet zero2050Not legally binding
TunisiaCarbon neutral(ity)2050Not legally binding
TuvaluNet zero2050Not legally binding
UgandaNet zero2050Not legally binding
United Arab EmiratesNet zero2050Not legally binding
United KingdomNet zero2050In law
United States of AmericaNet zero2050In law
UruguayNet zero2050Not legally binding
VanuatuNet zero2050Not legally binding
Vatican CityCarbon Neutral2050Not legally binding
VietnamNet zero2050Not legally binding
YemenNet zero2050Not legally binding
ZambiaNet zero2050Not legally binding
BahrainNet zero2060Not legally binding
ChinaCarbon neutral(ity)2060Not legally binding
IndonesiaNet zero2060Not legally binding
KazakhstanCarbon neutral(ity)2060Not legally binding
KuwaitCarbon neutral(ity)2060Not legally binding
Russian FederationCarbon neutral(ity)2060Not legally binding
Saudi ArabiaNet zero2060Not legally binding
TürkiyeNet zero2053Not legally binding
UkraineCarbon neutral(ity)2060Not legally binding
GhanaNet zero2070Not legally binding
IndiaNet zero2070Not legally binding
NigeriaNet zero2070In law
ThailandNet zero2065Not legally binding
BoliviaNo targetN/ANone
LibyaNo targetN/ANone
Syrian Arab RepublicNo targetN/ANone

The United States has an interim goal of a 50-52% reduction in emissions below 2005 levels by 2030, with a net zero target set for 2050.

Their primary economic rival, China, is focused on peaking its CO₂ emissions by 2030 instead of reducing them. Their net zero target, on the other hand, is currently set for 2060.

The European Union requires all 27 member states to reduce emissions 55% by 2030, with a net-zero goal for 2050.

Australia, which is among the top emitters per capita because of its fossil fuel usage, aims to reduce emissions by 43% from 2005 levels by 2030, while their net zero target is set for 2050.

Ambitious Climate Leaders and Laggards

While Comoros, Bhutan, Gabon, Suriname, and Guyana claim to have already achieved net zero, several major countries lack commitment.

Russia, one of the world’s largest polluters, has a net zero target set for 2060. Several other top-emitting countries, such as India and Indonesia, have net zero targets that also do not meet the Paris Climate Accord timeline of net zero by 2050. Their net-zero commitments are targeted at 2070 and 2060, respectively.

Iran is the only one of the top 10 largest emitting nations without a net zero target. However, it has an interim target of reducing emissions 3.45% by 2030.

Finland leads all countries with a legally binding net zero target set for the ambitious year 2035. Germany, a more populous nation, is also topping the Paris Climate Accord timeline, enshrining its net zero target into law for 2045.

The global race to net zero is ongoing, with countries at various stages of commitment. While significant progress has been made, many of the world’s largest emitters have yet to commit to net zero emission goals aligned with the Paris Climate Accord.

Continue Reading

Emissions

Visualized: Global CO2 Emissions Through Time (1950–2022)

In this streamgraph, we break down global CO2 emissions between 1950 and 2022 using data from Berkeley Earth and Global Carbon Project.

Published

on

Preview image of a streamgraph showing global CO2 emissions between 1950-2022, broken down by region.

Visualized: Global CO2 Emissions Through Time (1950-2022)

Global CO2 emissions have grown six-fold since 1950.

But which countries have contributed the most to this growth?

In this streamgraph, created in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, we answer that question using regional emissions data from Berkeley Earth and Global Carbon Project

Global CO2 Emissions: The Last 70 Years in Review

In the 1950s, the United States and the countries that later formed the European Union (EU) were the biggest emitters in the world, responsible for over 70% of total annual emissions.

However, this trend swiftly changed as other nations entered the fray.

For instance, China’s economic surge in the 1970s, particularly with the advent of Deng Xiaoping’s new economic strategy in 1978, triggered a notable uptick in the country’s CO2 output. From 1950 to 2000, China witnessed a surge of over 4,500% in emissions, reaching an annual 3.6 billion tonnes by 2000.

Similarly, India, Japan, and the broader Asian region, all experienced emission growth exceeding 1,000% between 1950 and 2000.

Metric tons of carbon dioxide (tCO2)195020002022Change 1950–2000Change 2000–2022
China0.1B3.6B11.4B4,529%213%
Asia (excl. China, Japan, and India)0.2B3.2B6.2B1,973%95%
United States of America2.5B6.0B5.1B136%-16%
European Union1.8B4.2B3.1B134%-26%
Rest of World0.4B2.5B2.9B465%16%
India0.1B1.0B2.8B1,500%189%
Russia0.4B1.5B1.7B256%12%
Africa0.1B0.9B1.4B876%52%
Japan0.1B1.3B1.1B1,132%-17%
South America0.1B0.8B1.1B621%34%
Canada0.2B0.6B0.6B268%-3%

Data note: 1950 was used as a beginning point for the graph due to the lack of available data for many countries prior to that year. 

As illustrated in the table above, the growth in global carbon emissions has slowed since 2000.

With that said, global emissions have still risen from 25 billion tonnes in 2000 to 37 billion in 2022, yet another all-time high. Today, over 40% of emissions come from the United States and China, underscoring their pivotal roles in shaping the global emissions landscape.

Where Are We Headed From Here?

The United Nations’ recent Emissions Gap report highlights a concerning reality: the ongoing rate of emissions combined with existing policies steers humanity towards a world that is 3°C warmer than pre-industrial levels. This contrasts starkly with the goals of 1.5–2°C agreed to in 2015.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects that such a degree of warming will bring catastrophic repercussions, from severe changes in weather patterns to rising sea levels, widespread extinctions, and critical disruptions to global food and water systems.

This underscores the critical need for swift, concerted action to curb emissions and mitigate the impending environmental challenges that are potentially before us.

Learn more about how electric utilities and the power sector can lead on the path toward decarbonization here.

Continue Reading
National Public Utilities Council

Popular