Decarbonization
Decarbonization Targets for the Largest U.S. Utilities
The following content is sponsored by the National Public Utilities Council
Decarbonization Targets for the Largest U.S. Utilities
This was originally posted on April 23, 2021, on Visual Capitalist.
The U.S. recently rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement and decarbonization is back on the minds of government officials and companies alike.
Though every sector plays a major role on the path to net zero carbon emissions, none are as impactful as the energy sector. In 2016, almost three-quarters of global GHG emissions came from energy consumption. With organizations looking to either curb energy consumption or transition to cleaner forms of energy, the pressure is on utilities to decarbonize and offer green alternatives.
How are U.S. utilities responding?
This infographic from the National Public Utilities Council highlights the decarbonization targets of the largest investor-owned and public U.S. utilities.
U.S. Utility Decarbonization Targets Through 2035
The American energy sector has many players, but the largest utilities account for the bulk of production.
For each state, we looked at the largest investor-owned and public electric utilities by retail sales as tracked by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Decarbonization targets were taken from each utility’s stated goals or sustainability report.
After narrowing down from 3,328 different entities and subsidiaries, the final list of 60 utilities accounted for 60% of U.S. energy sales in 2019 at just under 1.93 trillion MWh (megawatt hours).
Many companies on the list have multiple goals spread across different timeframes, but they can be grouped into a few distinct categories:
- Reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: These measures are either percentage-based or flat reductions, and also include becoming carbon neutral or “net zero” by balancing reduced emissions with carbon offsets.
- Reducing carbon intensity: These measures work on reducing the impact of electricity generated by fossil fuels, rather than reducing the amount directly.
- Increasing renewable energy production: These measures focus on adding renewable energy with a lower carbon footprint to the production mix and can be either percentage-based or flat additions.
- Increasing clean electricity production: These measures are centered around ensuring that electricity produced is 100% carbon free.
Utilities with decarbonization targets set for 2035 and earlier vary wildly in scope, from completely carbon neutral to minimal reductions.
Entity | State (Largest Provider) | Decarbonization Goal | Target Year |
---|---|---|---|
City of Seattle | WA | Carbon neutral | 2005 (since) |
ALLETE | MN | △50% Renewable energy | 2021 |
Exelon | DC, DE, IL, MD, NJ, PA | ▽15% GHG emissions | 2022 |
Otter Tail Power | ND | ▽30% CO2 emissions, △30% Renewable energy | 2022 |
Avangrid | CT, ME | ▽35% GHG emissions | 2025 |
Emera (Tampa Electric) | FL | ▽55% CO2 emissions | 2025 |
Green Mountain Power | VT | ▽100% CO2 emissions | 2025 |
NextEra Energy | FL | ▽67% CO2 emissions | 2025 |
NiSource | IN | ▽50% GHG emissions | 2025 |
NRG | TX | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2025 |
Avista Corp | ID, WA | Carbon neutral | 2027 |
AES | IN | ▽70% Carbon intensity | 2030 |
Alliant | IA, WI | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Ameren | IL, MO | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
American Electric Power | AR, KY, LA, MI, OK, OH, VA, WV | ▽70% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Arizona Public Service | AZ | △65% Clean electricity | 2030 |
Black Hills | SD, WY | ▽40% GHG emissions | 2030 |
City of Colorado Springs | CO | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
DTE Electric Company | MI | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Duke Energy | FL, IN, NC, OH, SC | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Entergy | AR, LA, MS | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Eversource | CT, MA, NH | Carbon neutral | 2030 |
FirstEnergy | MD, NJ, OH, PA | ▽30% GHG emissions | 2030 |
Green Mountain Power | VT | △100% Renewable energy | 2030 |
Long Island Power Authority | NY | ▽40% GHG emissions | 2030 |
MDU Resources | ND | ▽45% GHG emissions | 2030 |
National Grid | MA, NY, RI | ▽80% GHG emissions | 2030 |
NiSource | IN | ▽90% GHG emissions | 2030 |
NV Energy | NV | △50% Renewable energy | 2030 |
OGE Electric | OK | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Pacific Gas & Electric | CA | △60% Renewable energy | 2030 |
PacifiCorp | ID, OR, UT, WY | ▽60% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
PSEG | NJ | ▽13 million tons CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Puget Sound Energy | WA | Carbon neutral | 2030 |
Southern California Edison | CA | △60% Renewable energy | 2030 |
Southern Company | AL, GA, MS | ▽50% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Tennessee Valley Authority | TN | ▽70% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Vistra (TXU Energy Retail) | TX | ▽60% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
WEC Energy | WI | ▽40% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Xcel Energy | CO, MN, ND, NM, SD | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2030 |
Avangrid | CT, ME | Carbon neutral | 2035 |
Salt River Project | AZ | ▽65% Carbon intensity, ▽30% CO2 emissions | 2035 |
Tucson Electric Power | AZ | ▽80% CO2 emissions, △70% Renewable energy | 2035 |
It’s also important to note that carbon emission reductions are not equal across the board.
Reduction is traditionally based on a base-year measurement (usually 2000 or 2005) that changes for each utility, and a small reduction at a major energy producer can be more impactful than 100% clean energy at a small local utility.
U.S. Utility Decarbonization Targets 2040 and Beyond
From 2040 and beyond, the decarbonization efforts become more ambitious.
In line with many states and the federal government making sweeping clean energy commitments, most of the utility companies with decarbonization targets from 2040 to 2050 are aimed at either carbon neutrality or significant reductions.
For some companies these are their first and only targets, while others are building on smaller goals from earlier years. In the case of the few utility companies marked *N/A, a decarbonization target goal couldn’t be found.
Entity | State (Largest Provider) | Decarbonization Goal | Target Year |
---|---|---|---|
Ameren | IL, MO | ▽85% CO2 emissions | 2040 |
Black Hills | SD, WY | ▽70% GHG emissions | 2040 |
City of Colorado Springs | CO | ▽90% CO2 emissions | 2040 |
City of San Antonio | TX | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2040 |
CMS Energy | MI | Carbon neutral, △90% Clean electricity | 2040 |
Consolidated Edison | NY | △100% Clean electricity | 2040 |
Emera (Tampa Electric) | FL | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2040 |
Lincoln Electric System | NE | Carbon neutral | 2040 |
National Grid | MA, NY, RI | ▽90% GHG emissions | 2040 |
PNM Resources | NM | ▽100% CO2 emissions | 2040 |
Portland General Electric | OR | Carbon neutral | 2040 |
PPL | KY, PA | ▽70% CO2 emissions | 2040 |
Avista Corp | ID, WA | △100% Clean electricity | 2045 |
Hawaiian Electric Industries | HI | Carbon neutral, △100% Renewable energy | 2045 |
Idaho Power | ID | △100% Clean electricity | 2045 |
NorthWestern Energy | MT, SD | ▽90% Carbon intensity | 2045 |
Pacific Gas & Electric | CA | △100% Clean electricity | 2045 |
Puget Sound Energy | WA | △100% Clean electricity | 2045 |
Sempra | CA | △100% Clean electricity | 2045 |
Southern California Edison | CA | △100% Clean electricity | 2045 |
PSEG | NJ | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2046 |
Alliant | IA, WI | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Ameren | IL, MO | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
American Electric Power | AR, KY, LA, MI, OK, OH, VA, WV | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2050 |
Arizona Public Service | AZ | △100% Clean electricity | 2050 |
City of San Antonio | TX | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Dominion Energy | NC, SC, VA | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
DTE Electric Company | MI | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Duke Energy | FL, IN, NC, OH, SC | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Emera (Tampa Electric) | FL | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Entergy | AR, LA, MS | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Evergy | KS, MO | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2050 |
FirstEnergy | MD, NJ, OH, PA | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Long Island Power Authority | NY | ▽85% GHG emissions | 2050 |
National Grid | MA, NY, RI | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
NRG | TX | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
NV Energy | NV | △100% Clean electricity | 2050 |
Omaha Public Power District | NE | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
PacifiCorp | ID, OR, UT, WY | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2050 |
PPL | KY, PA | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2050 |
PSEG | NJ | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Salt River Project | AZ | ▽90% Carbon intensity | 2050 |
Southern Company | AL, GA, MS | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
Vistra (TXU Energy Retail) | TX | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
WEC Energy | WI | ▽80% CO2 emissions | 2050 |
Xcel Energy | CO, MN, ND, NM, SD | Carbon neutral | 2050 |
MidAmerican Energy | IA, IL | △100% Renewable energy | N/A |
Cleco Power | LA | N/A | N/A |
ENMAX (Versant Power) | ME | N/A | N/A |
Nebraska Public Power District | NE | N/A | N/A |
PUD 1 of Snohomish County | WA | N/A | N/A |
Unitil Energy Systems | NH | N/A | N/A |
While the targets set above are significant, they are also a long time away from being met. With pressure to decarbonize increasing across the board, utility companies may need to reassess the impact or timeliness of their decarbonization targets.
The National Public Utilities Council is a collaborative body of industry experts coming together to solve decarbonization challenges in the power sector and the proud sponsor of the Decarbonization Channel.
Decarbonization
The 2024 Utility Decarbonization Index
This column chart shows the top 10 rankings for the 2024 Decarbonization Index from the Annual Utility Decarbonization Report.
The 2024 Utility Decarbonization Index
Electric utilities and the power sector in the U.S. are crucial for averting the climate crisis, especially as electricity demand rises. But how do the nation’s largest electricity producers compare on the necessity of decarbonization?
In partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, we present the 2024 edition of our Annual Utility Decarbonization Index. The index uses the latest available data to track the decarbonization progress of the 47 largest investor-owned utilities (IOUs) in the United States.
The Index Ranking
The 47 IOUs featured in the Index are the largest private electricity producers in the U.S., accounting for over two-thirds of the nation’s electricity generation in 2022. As a result, these utilities’ decarbonization efforts will significantly impact the 33% of U.S. emissions that come from the power sector.
A score of five signifies that the utility is a leader in decarbonization compared to its peers. It does not mean that the utility has fully decarbonized or achieved net-zero emissions.
Here are the top 10 IOUs in this year’s ranking:
Rank | Company | Decarbonization Score |
---|---|---|
#1 | Pacific Gas and Electric | 4.6 |
#2 | Avangrid | 4.2 |
#3 | Public Service Enterprise Group | 4.1 |
#4 | NextEra Energy | 3.7 |
#5 | Dominion Energy | 3.6 |
#6 | American Electric Power | 3.4 |
#7 | Emera | 3.4 |
#8 | Fortis | 3.3 |
#9 | Sempra | 3.3 |
#10 | Constellation Energy | 3.3 |
After placing fourth last year, Pacific Gas and Electric is now #1 in the Annual Utility Decarbonization Index, thanks to significant improvements in fuel mix and emissions per customer.
The second and third-place utilities in this year’s Index, Avangrid and Public Service Enterprise Group, also greatly improved their emissions per customer figures from 2021–2022.
How Does it Work?
The Decarbonization Index uses the following six metrics to compare the current environmental efforts of the largest investor-owned utilities:
- Fuel Mix
The share of carbon-free sources such as nuclear and renewables in a company’s owned generation mix. - CO2 Emissions Intensity
The amount of CO2 emitted per megawatt-hour of electricity generated and purchased. - Total CO2 Emissions
Absolute CO2 emissions from owned and purchased electricity generation. - CO2 Emissions Per Customer
CO2 emissions from owned and purchased electricity generation per customer. - Decarbonization Goals
An evaluation of a company’s interim greenhouse gas reduction goal, ultimate net-zero target, and reported progress. - Carbon-Free Investment
The share of planned capital expenditure (CAPEX) for electricity generation allocated to carbon-free sources.
All 47 IOUs in the Decarbonization Index are scored on a scale of 0-5 for each of the six metrics. A utility’s final decarbonization score is the average of the six metrics.
The 2024 report assigns a score of zero where numbers are unreported to emphasize the importance of sustainability reporting.
In previous years, companies that did not report data for certain calculations were excluded from that metric, and their total decarbonization score was an average of five or fewer metrics, as opposed to all six.
Data for the index was pulled from company sustainability reports, quantitative ESG reporting templates from the Edison Electric Institute, and the Climate Disclosure Project’s Climate Change Questionnaire filings.
Download the 2024 Annual Utility Decarbonization Report
In addition to the Decarbonization Index, there’s much more, including:
- Inflation Reduction Act impacts
- Costs of renewables
- Year-to-year progression from the previous index
- Fuel mix rankings for the largest public utilities
- Gas utility emissions rankings
Are you interested in seeing the rest of the rankings? Download the 2024 NPUC Annual Utility Decarbonization Report and find out everything you need to know about the clean energy transition of the U.S. power sector.
Learn how the National Public Utilities Council is working toward the future of sustainable electricity.
Decarbonization
Visualized: Emission Reduction Targets by Country in 2024
This infographic shows the greenhouse gas emissions targets of all countries and their target years with data from Net Zero Tracker.
Visualized: Emission Reduction Targets by Country in 2024
Since 2021, another 40 countries have established climate goals for 2030. However, the path to net zero remains uneven.
With average national warming already 1.81°C above pre-industrial levels, the international pressure for countries to cut emissions faster and deeper is mounting. So where do countries stand today on their targets?
We’ve partnered with the National Public Utilities Council to answer just this question, using the latest national emission target data from Net Zero Tracker.
A Spotlight on Major Players
The largest countries and richest economies typically emit the most greenhouse gases and thus have the most crucial targets.
Country | End Target | End Target Year | New Commitment |
---|---|---|---|
Benin | Net zero | 2000 | Achieved |
Bhutan | Carbon negative | 2030 | Achieved |
Comoros | Net zero | 2050 | Achieved |
Gabon | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Achieved |
Guyana | Net zero | 2050 | Achieved |
Suriname | Net zero | 2050 | Achieved |
Albania | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Algeria | Reduction v. business-as-usual (BAU) | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Barbados | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Belarus | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Botswana | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Brunei | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Cameroon | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Congo | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Côte d'Ivoire | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Cuba | Other | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Czech Republic | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | In law |
Dominica | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Egypt | Other | 2030 | Not legally binding |
El Salvador | Absolute emissions target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Eswatini | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Guatemala | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | In law |
Honduras | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Iran | Other | 2030 | In law |
Iraq | Other | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Jamaica | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Jordan | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Kenya | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Liechtenstein | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Macedonia | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Maldives | Net zero | 2030 | In law |
Mauritania | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Mexico | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Moldova | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Mongolia | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Montenegro | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Morocco | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
North Korea | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Paraguay | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Philippines | Reduction v. BAU | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Poland | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Qatar | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
San Marino | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Serbia | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | In law |
Tajikistan | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Turkmenistan | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Uzbekistan | Emissions intensity target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Venezuela | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Zimbabwe | Emissions reduction target | 2030 | Not legally binding |
Bermuda | Other | 2035 | Not legally binding |
Finland | Climate neutral | 2035 | In law |
Antigua and Barbuda | Net zero | 2040 | Not legally binding |
Austria | Climate neutral | 2040 | In law |
Cayman Islands | Other | 2040 | Not legally binding |
Iceland | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2040 | In law |
Myanmar | Net zero | 2040 | Not legally binding |
Palestine | Other | 2040 | Not legally binding |
Denmark | Net zero | 2045 | Not legally binding |
Germany | Climate neutral | 2045 | In law |
Nepal | Net zero | 2045 | Not legally binding |
Sweden | Net zero | 2045 | In law |
Afghanistan | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Andorra | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Angola | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Argentina | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Armenia | Climate neutral | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Australia | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Azerbaijan | Emissions reduction target | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Bangladesh | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Belgium | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Belize | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Emissions reduction target | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Brazil | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Bulgaria | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Burkina Faso | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Burundi | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Cambodia | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Canada | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Cape Verde | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Central African Republic | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Chad | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Chile | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | In law |
Colombia | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | In law |
Cook Islands | Carbon neutral | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Costa Rica | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Croatia | Climate neutral | 2050 | In law |
Cyprus | Climate neutral | 2050 | In law |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Djibouti | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Dominican Republic | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Ecuador | Zero carbon | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Equatorial Guinea | Emissions reduction target | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Eritrea | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Estonia | Zero emissions | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Ethiopia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
European Union | Climate neutral | 2050 | In law |
Fiji | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
France | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Georgia | Climate neutral | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Greece | Climate neutral | 2050 | In law |
Grenada | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Guinea | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Guinea-Bissau | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Haiti | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Hungary | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Ireland | Climate neutral | 2050 | In law |
Israel | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Italy | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Japan | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | In law |
Kiribati | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Kyrgyzstan | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Laos | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Latvia | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Lebanon | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Lesotho | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Liberia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Lithuania | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Luxembourg | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Madagascar | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Malawi | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Malaysia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Mali | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Malta | Climate neutral | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Marshall Islands | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Mauritius | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Micronesia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Monaco | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Mozambique | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Namibia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Nauru | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Netherlands | Emissions reduction target | 2050 | In law |
New Zealand | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Nicaragua | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Niger | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Niue | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Norway | Emissions reduction target | 2050 | In law |
Oman | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Pakistan | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Palau | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Panama | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Papua New Guinea | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Peru | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Portugal | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | In law |
Romania | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Rwanda | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Saint Lucia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Samoa | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Sao Tome and Principe | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Senegal | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Seychelles | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Sierra Leone | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Singapore | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Slovakia | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Slovenia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Solomon Islands | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Somalia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
South Africa | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
South Korea | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
South Sudan | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Spain | Climate neutral | 2050 | In law |
Sri Lanka | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Sudan | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Switzerland | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Tanzania | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
The Bahamas | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
The Gambia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Timor-Leste | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Togo | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Tonga | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Trinidad and Tobago | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Tunisia | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Tuvalu | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Uganda | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
United Arab Emirates | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
United Kingdom | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
United States of America | Net zero | 2050 | In law |
Uruguay | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Vanuatu | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Vatican City | Carbon Neutral | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Vietnam | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Yemen | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Zambia | Net zero | 2050 | Not legally binding |
Bahrain | Net zero | 2060 | Not legally binding |
China | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Indonesia | Net zero | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Kazakhstan | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Kuwait | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Russian Federation | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Saudi Arabia | Net zero | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Türkiye | Net zero | 2053 | Not legally binding |
Ukraine | Carbon neutral(ity) | 2060 | Not legally binding |
Ghana | Net zero | 2070 | Not legally binding |
India | Net zero | 2070 | Not legally binding |
Nigeria | Net zero | 2070 | In law |
Thailand | Net zero | 2065 | Not legally binding |
Bolivia | No target | N/A | None |
Libya | No target | N/A | None |
Syrian Arab Republic | No target | N/A | None |
The United States has an interim goal of a 50-52% reduction in emissions below 2005 levels by 2030, with a net zero target set for 2050.
Their primary economic rival, China, is focused on peaking its CO₂ emissions by 2030 instead of reducing them. Their net zero target, on the other hand, is currently set for 2060.
The European Union requires all 27 member states to reduce emissions 55% by 2030, with a net-zero goal for 2050.
Australia, which is among the top emitters per capita because of its fossil fuel usage, aims to reduce emissions by 43% from 2005 levels by 2030, while their net zero target is set for 2050.
Ambitious Climate Leaders and Laggards
While Comoros, Bhutan, Gabon, Suriname, and Guyana claim to have already achieved net zero, several major countries lack commitment.
Russia, one of the world’s largest polluters, has a net zero target set for 2060. Several other top-emitting countries, such as India and Indonesia, have net zero targets that also do not meet the Paris Climate Accord timeline of net zero by 2050. Their net-zero commitments are targeted at 2070 and 2060, respectively.
Iran is the only one of the top 10 largest emitting nations without a net zero target. However, it has an interim target of reducing emissions 3.45% by 2030.
Finland leads all countries with a legally binding net zero target set for the ambitious year 2035. Germany, a more populous nation, is also topping the Paris Climate Accord timeline, enshrining its net zero target into law for 2045.
The global race to net zero is ongoing, with countries at various stages of commitment. While significant progress has been made, many of the world’s largest emitters have yet to commit to net zero emission goals aligned with the Paris Climate Accord.
-
Energy Shift1 year ago
Ranked: The Cheapest Sources of Electricity in the U.S.
-
Electrification2 years ago
Visualized: How the Power Grid Works
-
Energy Shift2 years ago
Animated: 70 Years of U.S. Electricity Generation by Source
-
Emissions7 months ago
The Most Polluted Cities in the U.S.
-
Clean Energy1 year ago
Breaking Down the $110 Trillion Cost of the Clean Energy Transition
-
Clean Energy2 years ago
The 30 Largest U.S. Hydropower Plants
-
Clean Energy2 years ago
Breaking Down Clean Energy Funding in the Inflation Reduction Act
-
Emissions2 years ago
Visualizing Global Per Capita CO2 Emissions